n8n vs Make (Integromat): Open-Source Self-Hosting vs SaaS
Compare costs, security compliance, custom code execution, and scalability between self-hosted n8n and Make.com.
n8n+Make
Architecture & Overview
Make provides a visually slick SaaS drag-and-drop automation builder billed on operation volume. n8n offers an open-source, fair-code workflow engine that can be self-hosted on your own cloud infrastructure for predictable, zero-per-task costs.
Technical Comparison
| Criteria | n8n (Self-Hosted) | Make.com (SaaS) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Flat Server Cost (e.g. ₹0 - ₹2,000/mo) | Per-Operation Tiered Subscriptions |
| Data Privacy & Security | 100% On-Premise / Your Cloud | Third-Party SaaS Storage |
| Custom Code Support | Full JavaScript & Python Execution | Basic Functions |
| Integration Library | 400+ Native Connectors | 1,500+ Native Apps |
Key Architectural Takeaways
- Choose self-hosted n8n for high-volume tasks, HIPAA/GDPR data compliance, and custom code flexibility.
- Choose Make for fast non-technical setups with pre-built niche SaaS connectors.
Cut Your Automation SaaS Bill
Let Hostwire deploy self-hosted n8n on zero-waste cloud hosting and migrate your workflows.
Get Automation Audit →Frequently Asked Questions
How much can self-hosted n8n save compared to Make?
Companies running 100,000+ monthly workflow operations typically save 80% to 90% by switching from Make/Zapier to self-hosted n8n.